Reverse Paranoia

Graphology at Home – Lesson 21 – Draw Someone E-g

E 

Effeminacy: ankles, feet and wrists small; arms and legs tapering; curved lines on body of male; full lips on male; high heeled shoes; lashes (male figure).

• Effeminacy/homo-erotic tendency/homosexual tendency: lashes on male.

• Effeminacy/insecurity: feet small, male subject.

• Effeminate/narcissistic/submissive: emphasis on circles in depicting body.

• Egocentric/hysteria/immaturity/repression: eye as a circle (no pupil).

• Egocentric/immature/over concern of material criteria for social status: clothing carefully rendered.

• Egocentric/schizoid: body emphasis (under clothed).

• Egotism/narcissism: doodling of subject’s name.

• Emotional control (rigid): stiff posture.

• Emotional exhaustion/lack of drive/low energy: reclined or seated same sex figure.

• Emotional fixation or wish to return to youth/immaturity: younger figure than subject.

• Emphasis on possession and social prestige: clothing elaboration, grooming. Need for social approval and dominance: over clothed.

• Evasion/guilt/lack of confidence/possible psychopath: hands behind back or in pockets.

• Evasion of body problems: peanut man, snowman, and stick man.

• Evasion of problems/reluctance to reveal self: resistance to drawing figures.

• Evasiveness: figure of profile.

• Exhibitionism/sexual preoccupation: earrings.

• Exhibitionistic tendency/social accessibility/social communications/ social dependency: full-faced figure.

• Expectation of aggression from environment or impaired self-esteem possible (may symbolize psychic trauma): facial scars on same sex figure.

• Externalized aggression: hands emphasized, bushy eyebrows.

• Externalized aggression/paranoia: eye emphasized.

• Extroversion/need for support: left-to-right strokes.

F

• Fantasy relative to “femininity”: hat crease.

• Feeling of body disorganization/maternal dependence/psycho-
sexual immaturity/schizoid/schizophrenic: joint and knuckle emphasis.

• Feeling of decline associated with advancing age (shaded legs may be homosexual tendency): full body with shaded or thin legs.

• Feeling of emasculation/anxiety or masculine inadequacy: area depicted as broken, cut, damaged or otherwise impaired.

• Feelings of inadequacy or rejection/internalized hostility/self-contempt: cartoon figure, clown.

• Feelings of inadequacy: small same sex figure, tiny drawing.

• Feelings of masculine insufficiency: shoulders or other masculine details exaggerated.

• Felt lack of masculinity and virility: hair white on male figure.

• Felt lack of status/low self-esteem: disheveled, unkempt figure.

• Felt lack of virility: balding male figure.

• Felt subjection to strong environmental pressure or stress, with fear of psychosis: strong wind in scene of human figure drawing.

• Female protest/feminine role rejection: drawing male first, female subject.

• Female regarded as sexually rejecting: hand of female figure in pelvic area, male subject.

• Feminine identification: emphasis on left side of figure.

• Feminine identification dealt with by narcissism and obsessive-compulsive mechanism: hair parted in middle, head split.

• Feminine identification with dominant mother: chest emphasis, female subject.

• Feminine trait: rounded trunk.

• Femininity: rounded lines in formation of body.

• Forced amiability/inappropriate affection: clown-like mouth.

• Guilt, strong wish to be castrated: armless figure of male, male subject.

• Guilt (as theft or masturbation): shaded figures.

• Guilt/depression/schizophrenia/withdrawal: arms omitted.

This concludes list E-G

Joel Engel is the author of “Handwriting Analysis Self-Taught” (Penguin Books)
http://careertest.ws
http://www.learngraphology.com

About the Author

Graphologist Joel Engel is the author of “Handwriting Analysis Self-Taught,” (Penguin Books). He operates online personality types and career matching.
For more information visit: http://careertest.ws

Barack Obama: Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Toxic Coworkers: How to Deal with Dysfunctional People on the Job $7.98 We’ve all worked with someone “difficult,” someone who could always be trusted to blow up to space out or do or say something wildly inappropriate. As it happens, those of us who concluded “the guy’s just nuts” were right: a fair number of those impossible-to-get-along-with employees actually do have full-fledged personality disorders. In Toxic Coworkers, the au…